Returns Leave Retailers Between Rock and Hard Place


By George Anderson
Customer returns are definitely a pain in the bottom line.
Okay, most returns are legitimate and retailers gladly accept them, but a large number are fraudulent and, based on the most not-so-recent figures from 2002, cost the industry
about $16 billion a year.
Clothing retailers, for example, are often faced with having to determine where the line is between making the customer happy and putting an end to return policy abuses.
According to a Knight Ridders Newspapers’ report, Alta, an upscale boutique in San Jose, Ca., accepted a return of an expensive blouse even though it had its tags removed
and smelled of perfume.
“It was a full-price item, and we had to toss it,” general manager Laura Swenson said. “But what can I do? We can’t clean it and resell it, so it was just a loss to us. Oh boy,
that irritates you when you have to do that. Everyone’s margins are tight.”
Some stores have begun using services that track chronic returners to help decrease the number of items coming back. Some stores have gone so far as to refuse items from customers
they deem to be abusing return policies.
While this may help decrease some instances of fraud, it hardly appears to be an answer when compared to the possible loss of business associated with offending customers who
have legitimate reason for making a return. A survey done by Newgistics and Harris Interactive found 85 percent of consumers said they would shop elsewhere if a retailer made
it difficult to return merchandise.
Moderator’s Comment: How do retailers deal with legitimate concerns about return fraud without alienating good customers? –
George Anderson – Moderator
Join the Discussion!
5 Comments on "Returns Leave Retailers Between Rock and Hard Place"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I see this fraud all the time in the supermarket. Why is it we don’t worry about the loss of future legitimate sales from the shoplifter who is now banned from the store? What’s the difference?
Well trained employees, and ongoing announcements of return policies may be the first step….especially during key selling and Holiday periods.
As has been mentioned, retailers’ image (especially in the non foods arenas) and how they are positioned in the marketplace should favorably alter the fraud issue.
One might assume loyal shoppers and ones given the service they desire from a retailer should reduce returns, in general.