Living in a DIY World


By George Anderson
It may be true that, if you want something done right, you should do it yourself. On the other hand, some say, being asked to do everything when you’re shopping, banking or involved in other tasks of daily life is getting to be a pain.
According to a report in the Chicago Tribune, Americans are getting a little sick and tired of self-serve while filling up their gas tanks, banking or checking out at the store. They want someone to wait on them, thank you very much.
Nichols Fox is writing a book on the topic — The Case Against Efficiency. “We’re exhausted doing all this work,” she said. “There’s just so much that we have been asked to take over. I think we are reaching a breaking point here.”
Dennis Galletta, an information systems professor at Temple University’s Fox School of Business and Management, disagrees. “I think nowadays people are less patient. People not only want this technology, they demand it.”
Paul Croce, an American studies professor at Stetson University, says each position has merit. “It’s putting on the citizen, the non-expert, a task that is potentially complex,” he said. “That’s a responsibility that can be freeing but can be a real burden for a lot of people.”
Cherie Kerr, a public speaking and communications consultant for ExecuProv, said there’s a price being paid for all this self-sufficiency. “People are just not connecting as much as they once did, or as they should,” she said. “A lot of people do not want to talk to people anymore.”
Moderator’s Comment: What are your views on the expansion of self-service technology? Are consumers getting tired of being asked to do it themselves?
Is the rise of self-serve technology matched by a decline in our ability to communicate with one another? –
George Anderson – Moderator
Join the Discussion!
25 Comments on "Living in a DIY World"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The problem is (as others have already said) that there is little or no apparent reward for DIY behavior.
The automation is fabulous for airport check-ins, where a 20-30 minute wait, minimum, used to be the norm. And God forbid we lose the ability to do our own routine banking transactions, and have to get in line for everything, behind the guy with “the problem” that takes forever. I think it’s balancing out quite well, actually. I’ve never been a fan of self-checkout, because about one time in three, whether it’s me or someone else, there’s “a problem” with the machine or the scanning or whatever. There are bound to be customers who want the personal contact, and if it fits your business plan in terms of cost and customer loyalty to offer more in-store help, by all means, provide it! To my experience, a majority of stores seem understaffed, and trying to find someone who knows where items are, or what policies are, is often extremely difficult.
I see the DIY World as just one more option for consumers. As more and more venues offer DIY – more and more of their competitors are offering enhanced service. Personally I see it as a win, win !
I think even the slow kids are starting to wonder why the prices go up when they do the work. Pump your own gas — the price of gas rises. Use your ATM and pay higher bank service charges on some accounts. Book your own flights and check yourself in online or at the airport and — if you’re a business traveler on a busy route — sit down before you read the ticket price. Too many of these economic savings might bankrupt you.
For me, it depends on the situation. I don’t mind doing everything for myself at a gas station, but maybe it’s just because I have gotten used to it. Self-checkout is fine when it saves you time, but so often it doesn’t, as was mentioned, due to problems with either the machines or people that can’t figure out how to use them. And why is there such a disconnect with companies saving money by us picking up more of the work, but no reduction in charges and, at times, even increases? If stores want more of us to use self-scan, why don’t they offer a discount for us to use self-scan and save them money?
Given the deplorable level of service in most retail establishments today, I would rather serve myself, expedite the process and avoid the frustration.
Self service via technology is positive for those who grew up on it; and understand how to use it. But, some people see this self service as cost cutting, and faceless interaction, which is bothersome.
There has to be a balance that companies utilize based on
their customer base needs, and not to cut cost / labor out.
Aren’t Baby Boomers willing to pay for service, and attention?
The expansion of the technology is great for the consumers, giving them the options they demand. Where I think retailers go wrong is not taking advantage of the savings of time by their workforce to enhance service for when you don’t want the option!
Taking advantage of technology, for the most part to improve customer service, enhance the experience and create a new type of shopping environment, has not been the focus of retailers. It’s been merely a cost savings option. Those that connect technology and service as an advantage could experience an overwhelming positive consumer response.
Self-scan at my local Jewel is a wonderful thing — and I actually feel my service experience is enhanced — WHEN the self-scan pod attendant is there smiling at me and has already punched the “approved” button necessary to allow me to purchase an adult beverage. It is NOT an enhanced experience when the pod attendant, who is often doubling as the front-end supervisor, is down at Check-out Seven approving someone’s check and I have to wait three minutes for them to get back.
The mistake retailers are making is confusing “self-scan” with “self-service.” We are happy to do more of the “work” when it actually makes things faster/easier for us. But we do not want to give up service in the form of helpful suggestions, attentiveness and speedy problem resolution.
Studies continue to point to three consumer wishes for in-store service: Directions, information and ideas. Given differences in store lay-out (and growth in format size), consumers can’t find things. Next, seeking a solution, consumers want product information (will this product fill my need?). Finally, consumers say they enjoy shopping where they can get ‘ideas’ (new menus, fix-it recommendations, variety suggestions, etc).
When ‘price’ isn’t the retailer’s marketing angle, the fastest-growing formats appear to be offering enhanced service to meet the top 3 consumer service wish-list items. These formats are making money: So, they have figured out that retailers can spend on service and reap the sales rewards to make the practice a pay-out.
I dislike not having a person to speak with when I call companies. Many times, I choose the wrong number just to be transferred again and again. Sigh!
Lately, I dislike shopping for food. I put the food in the cart, I place the food on the conveyor for the cashier, I place the bags of food back in the cart, I put the bags in my car, and then I carry the food into the house. Geeze!
I grew up in the 50’s. I miss customer service A LOT. (Especially when I smell like gas because I fueled up on the way to work.)
I think the viewpoint of many boomers and above is that we are still paying more and getting less. If the retailers are saving more money through automation, they must be putting it into their own pockets instead of giving a little back, and, frankly, we resent that.
Pumping gas…we’re used to it by now. On-line banking and ATM’s…get with the program. Self checkouts…you don’t have to if you don’t want to – get in another line or go someplace else.
The “Me” generation and younger never really had customer service so they don’t know what it is. They’ll adapt easily to anything that’s helps them move faster.
10 years from now, as long as there’s room for my “Jazzy” to get in and out easily, I guess I won’t care what kind of service I receive (which is most likely none).
First, we can’t have it both ways – more personal service and low prices, although as Ryan points out, the low prices do not seem to be passed on to the consumer. As to convenience, there is no turning back. Between the consumer who is not prepared to pay when it is his turn at the counter, etc. and the clerk who seems to be getting worse each day, the self serve is a good option. My family uses the self check-out at the local supermarket and we are out in no time. I avoid a manned line at the supermarket, bank and airport as much as possible.
I think the lessons here are two-fold: one, know your customer and offer the range of service levels that meet their varied needs. Both points of view are right – the world is too DIY and not enough at the same time – because they aren’t necessarily talking about the same people. Two, chuck the ‘disconnected’ pap where it belongs: the trash. Because I’m not spending extra hours waiting in line, because I telecommute, I have many more hours to spend quality, in-person time with my family. And because of IM, I have a closer relationship now with my brother who lives half a country away than I did when we lived in the same city – we talk more! Just because these people fear technology, don’t transfer your fears to me. Frankly, it’s depressing when the hotel front desk recognizes me on sight and knows my name.
There is room for both self-service and personal service in the retail stores of today. I will not buy gas from a station that does not have “pay at the pump.” I do not want to go inside when paying with a credit card. By completing the transaction myself, the cashier is able to help other customers who need assistance. The same goes for self check out at the supermarket. If I have 2 items, why should I wait behind another customer when I can check myself out in less than a minute? Self-service is not appropriate for many retail situations but most consumers appreciate the choice in those that are.