‘Limited Quantities’ Make Customers Angry

By George Anderson
It’s common legal wording. A retailer runs an ad on a promotion item and includes provisos such as “while supplies last,” “limited quantities,” or “no rainchecks,” to let consumers know there is not an endless supply of product and that sales are made on a first-come, first-served basis.
While the practice of running limited supply items at a really low, sometimes even loss leader, price can be very effective, it doesn’t make the consumers who were unable to
get the desired product any happier when they find out it is no longer available.
Such was the case with a consumer from New York State who went to a local Wal-Mart last Friday at 3 a.m. to wait outside for the store to open at five so he could buy a $398 HP laptop advertised by the retailer.
When the consumer, Greg DiNunzio, entered the store at 5 a.m., he asked a Wal-Mart associate where he could find the laptop. It was then he was informed they were already gone.
Mr. DiNunzio told the Times Herald-Record, “I said, ‘How can they be all gone? The rope hasn’t even been cut yet!’ She said, ‘Oh, we only had 22 of the laptops. Tickets were issued for them, and they’ve already been sold.’ “
Sharon Weber, a Wal-Mart spokesperson, expressed regret but said the company was fair in how they handled the promotion.
“We only wish the best for our customers, and people are very sad when every customer can’t get the item that they want,” she said. “Promotional items came in limited quantities and that’s what our ad said – ‘while supplies last.’ We did the best we could with the numbers that we had to ensure a fair distribution to our stores.”
Mr. DiNunzio told the paper he plans to file a complaint with the New York Attorney General’s Office.
Moderator’s Comment: Do consumers accept out-of-stocks when it comes to limited quantity items or do retailers, in effect, do themselves more harm than
good by advertising such items? –
George Anderson – Moderator
Join the Discussion!
17 Comments on "‘Limited Quantities’ Make Customers Angry"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
To protect customer good will, and also because it’s just the right thing to do, I’d advertise the quantity available right up front in the ad. And, as much as possible, I’d give rainchecks.
Wake up, fellow retailers. Don’t you understand that the “limited quantities” of specially-priced merchandise at Wal-Mart and other retailers were already spoken for by employees? It’s one of their perquisites (perks). Further, the success of “Black Friday” websites that prematurely “out” sacrosanct Thanksgiving Day ads weeks in advance have given online shoppers early access to “limited offers.” It’s no wonder that all the good stuff is gone before the doors open, and every retail commentator out there with internal experience has experienced this phenomenon.
Most people probably know that if they aren’t at the store long before the doors open (at sometimes outrageously early hours, as last week) then there is no chance of getting one of these promotional items so decide not to bother and lose interest in whatever else the retailer may have on offer. Seems to me a foolproof way of losing business rather than gaining it.
My 8 year old daughter saw the ad for the $398 HP laptop and wanted us to go and get one. I told her that they were “limited quantity” and would definitely be gone by the time we got to the store. She immediately wanted to know how they could get away with lying like that. I started to explain that it was not a lie since they mentioned, “quantities are limited” …. then stopped.
I don’t know were the line is when the phrase “quantities are limited” is used but it is more than zero and for a store with the volume of a Wal-Mart, probably above 22. It may not be illegal but is also not right. Wasn’t Wal-Mart built on “everyday low prices”?
It’s amazing that Wal-Mart, with what is one of the biggest ongoing PR problems of any retailer in American history, would infuriate its loyal customers this way. Do the geniuses in the buying department understand that the PR people struggle daily to put a positive spin on the corporation’s image? The best way to create good PR is to repeatedly give the customer what she wants, and if HP couldn’t make enough cheap laptops to meet customer demand (could this be the problem?), they should never have promoted them for the holidays.
Limited quantities or similar phrasing is a part of accepted sales promotions. Anyone who doesn’t expect OOSs on a sales item is not reflecting real-world retail conditions. However, Wal-Mart’s position on selling products to customer’s without a true presence (prior to an ad breaking) borders the line of bait and switch tactics. Reasonable and viable expectations for product availabilities should be communicated whenever a spectacular ad is placed, so that the purchasing public can include this information as part of their buying assumptions. The auto industry does this as a matter of standard practice. This is only good habit for maintaining excellent consumer relations and communication.
These “specials” to get people into the store do more harm than good. Example: I went to Linens ‘n Things for an item advertised in their sale flyer–a 500 pc set of poker chips in a nice case for $29.99, regular price $69.99. Needless to say, they were all gone. A very helpful sales clerk assisted me by finding her sales flyer so I could point out what I was looking for. Almost every item in it had “Sold Out” written in black marker over it. I was angry to discover that 75 to 80 percent of their advertised items were all gone within an hour. Either they had 1 or 2 of each item or, even worse, none.
Luckily for me, I went 2 blocks up the street to Macy’s and found a similar set on sale for $34.99 (also pictured in their sales flyer), and they had stacks and stacks of them. I ended up buying two. Can you guess where I’ll be shopping more from now on?
There’s a big difference between having a reasonable quantity, versus having a token quantity. Retailers who have only a token quantity should have their ads say something like, “Only 10 per store.” Either way, when you run out, you make enemies. Limiting your sale items is An Officially Endorsed Policy of the Sales Prevention Institute.
There is also a big difference between ridiculous promotions and legitimate ones. Who in their right mind would think that quantities would be anything but limited for that HP Laptop? Electronics is partially a fad-driven business. Heck, the hot holiday items in this category often go on allotment at full retail. Electronics retailers would be wise to rethink the use of the ridiculous promotion. How about as a reward to their most cherished customers?
“Limited quantity” advertising is an added annoyance for customers, just one of many (surly service, out of stocks, too few registers, etc.). One reason is that it’s assumed quantities of most discounted items are limited in some manner, so why advertise that? It’s when quantities are severely limited, as in the Wal-Mart example, that customers feel duped. Die-hard customers will continue to show up early to wait in lines to get these limited quantity bargains; others will feel fortunate if the items are not out of stock. “Limited quantity” items probably won’t change buying patterns or anger a significant number of customers enough to make retailers discontinue the practice. However, combined with other annoyances, the customers walk away.
I find it fascinating that mass retailers are always held accountable when quantities run out on special items yet, when companies like H&M intentionally bring limited quantities of high-demand, short-run designer programs in a few stores and the items sell out immediately (as happened with the recent Stella McCartney collection), it is hailed as a marketing coup! Somehow consumers are ENTITLED to unlimited supplies of advertised products at mass?
As a consumer, limited quantity ads should be administered on a first come, first serve basis. Handing out tickets prior to the beginning of the actual sale is not a good business practice. Consumers become disgruntled when they have waited until the appointed time and then find that the items are not available.
The reason a company cannot advertise the quanities that are available is because no two stores are the same so, in the cases of centralized buying, allocations must be skewed heavily in order to meet the appropriate demand. Within every company, there are always top stores selling 15-20 times more goods than that of the bottom stores.
This problem is only compounded when other retailers allow for the stores to order their merchandise and goods are misallocated due to the fact that the stores, doing the right thing in being entrepreneurial, will try to pick up additional goods and drive their business.
The best that customers can hope for is that retailers will advertise the minimum quantity allocated to each store, and they will have to be savvy enough to know to travel to locations where demand will be lower than supply.