Through a special arrangement, presented here for discussion is a summary of an article from Retail Paradox, Retail Systems Research's weekly analysis on emerging issues facing retailers.
It's very tempting to try to declare that 2010 will be the year of the mobile consumer. However, I think 2010 will see the real beginning of something bigger, and that is "transparent retailing."
By transparent, I mean retailers will have to provide consumers with more access, at a more granular level, to more information about their operations and how consumers fit into those operations. It might be as simple as providing consumers with searchable, analyzable purchase history online, or as complex as providing the carbon footprint of products or processes. It might come from the mobile channel, through price or availability comparisons, or from the online channel around product reviews or ratings.
There are three trends at play that will converge in 2010, I believe, that will force retailers into more transparent retailing:
Take all three of these trends and wrap them around customer expectations. As a consumer, I expect to have access to the same capabilities and information in one channel that I can get from another. I expect to be able to compare prices, products, reviews, availability, and more, not just across channels but across retailers. I expect to be able to understand how the products you sell impact my life and my world.
If you make your margin by exploiting some kind of information advantage over your customers - whether that's knowing the fair price when your customers don't, or product quality issues that you're not being up front about, or even whether you have more of an item available or not (or if your competitors do) - I have a feeling the next year is going to be tough. And the next decade even tougher.
Discussion Questions: In what areas do you see transparency becoming more critical for retailers and brands in 2010? Where will the industry be most challenged in delivering greater transparency?
I think Supply Chain is an interesting way to become transparent, and feel it falls within the domain of sustainability. Here is where a retailer can control the price of things and since petroleum or transportation costs put so much strain on pricing, now may be the time to rethink these strategies, depending upon price vs value and what can be delivered to the consumer in the best possible way.
My case is that I can only import a certain type of fabric, but the product is made in the U.S.A.. I've had to do a cost/benefit analysis and be clear with the customer on how the product has been put together so they can appreciate the finer points. And now I'm working on making it even more visible to them through some sort of certifications.
Kim Barrington, President, the kimbro agency
"Transparency" is for sure a growing issue, but I'm thinking of transparency in the sense that stores are basically quasi-public places, and with shoppers being wired for both sound and video, stores will soon be subject to more surveillance than the drones provide in Afghanistan. In this case, we have already spent years in building the metrics that the "drones" will be reporting to the outside world.
Demand singularity is simply not a workable concept in the retail world. Demand forecasting, adapted for limited consumer group modeling, is a necessity to achieve economies of scale in distribution, effort and marketing.
Online, demand singularity can be presented, although this approach has yet to show any pervasive uptake or best practice implementation. The idea that altering what a specific consumer sees as a function of the information available about that consumer remains deeply intriguing...and the actual implementation remains a subject for enormous debate. All predictive modeling must draw on data, and the data must be weighted, interpreted, and extrapolated from; which leads to endless discussions of what weighting, how arrived at, what interpretation, and how extrapolated.
As for "green," while it is politically incorrect, I have yet to see overwhelming consumer adoption of the "green" philosophy either in supporting apparently "green" brands and products, or in the willingness to pay more for those products or brands. Yes, "green" is topical. To what extent does the consumer's perception of that status impact intent-to-buy? I haven't seen definitive research. My personal opinion is that "green" is relatively low on the scale after value, quality, and fit with the consumer's physical needs. "Green" is a higher order (thank you Maslov) need, and becomes relevant when all other need states are equal. That is almost never the case in retail, or usually only with commodity merchandise.
Don Delzell, Managing Director, Retail Advantage
The most important move retailers made to maximize sales success during the recent holiday selling season was an opaque one. They limited inventory while maintaining margins. What a way to kick off the age of transparency. To my recollection, most of the transparency steps made for consumers by brands and retailers over the years were forced by the government. Ingredients, country of origin, certifications, warnings, etc. They were hardly voluntary and there's no reason to believe that will change. Just more government control. Conversely, consumers are notoriously resistant to additional intrusions into their privacy. In-store RFID applications, while essentially ready to implement, are only slowly gaining traction. When asked about more access to their personal preferences and practices, shoppers are always reluctant.
Perhaps the best we can hope for is translucency.
M. Jericho Banks PhD, President, CEO, Forensic Marketing LLC
The latter two are not consumer trends unless it's an obvious deviation from their values, or a big ticket item. I would not advise retailers to spend much time discussing channel distribution or how you found them. Sustainability is a responsibility and not a differentiator.
Customers desire simplicity and their needs to be filled. Don't confuse your responsibilities with what is important to them.
Christopher P. Ramey, President, Affluent Insights