[Image of: RetailWire Logo and Tagline (for print)]

BUSINESS TIPS

Febreze:
Breathing New Life Into an Under-Served Category
SymphonyIRI Group:
Shopper-Centric Execution
DemandTec:
Demand-Driven Retail Strategies
Nestle Purina:
Center Store/Pet Category
MarketingLab:
iShopper Marketing Evolution
IBM:
Enterprise Marketing Management
Nature Made:
Vitamin Category
Precima:
Shopper-Centric Retailing
AT&T:
Experiencing Mobile Barcodes
[7 comments]

Optimizing Cash Flow with SKU-Level Forecasting

June 8, 2009

By Dan Raftery, president, Raftery Resource Network, Inc. and Aaron Raftery, project manager, Lime Energy, Inc.

Several supply chain specialists at the recent IE Group CPG Forecasting and Planning Summit in Chicago offered top-level peeks into their demand forecasting methods. Paul McMorrow, senior supply planning manager at H. J. Heinz Company, highlighted the new imperative for this discipline: to free up internal cash flow in response to the tightening credit market and other forces in the current economic climate. Mr. McMorrow and other speakers outlined strategies to reduce inventory-related drains on cash flow by increasing SKU-level forecasting accuracy through SKU fragmentation techniques.

Alan Fang, vice president, business process re-engineering & applications, Easton-Bell Sports, Inc., offered a matrix framework that crosses A-B-C SKU productivity against X-Y-Z forecast accuracy, creating a grid of nine "buckets." The AX bucket would contain SKUs with the highest sales volume and greatest forecast accuracy. An example of how forecasters can use this matrix: to reduce inventory levels of the C SKUs (lowest sales volume), forecasters can focus on products in the CX bucket (slow-movers with the most reliable forecasts).

Jan Steuber, demand planning, supply chain, MARS, presented a similar SKU segmentation methodology. However, instead of fragmenting SKUs using forecast accuracy, MARS crosses SKU productivity with X-Y-Z demand variability. Mr. Steuber showed that demand variability has a significant negative correlation to forecast accuracy, indicating that these two variables capture similar information. An advantage to using demand variability is that it also provides an entry point for reducing forecast error. By adopting marketing strategies that incorporate demand variability, Mr. Steuber suggests businesses may be able to indirectly improve the accuracy of their forecasts. 

Discussion Questions: What advantages do you see in using SKU segmentation in forecasting? What are the "watch-outs?" Are CPG supply chain forecast experts really being used for critical business strategies such as cash flow optimization or is this a lightly tapped resource?

FINANCIALS:     [NYSE:HNZ]

Discussion Questions



While we value unfettered opinion, we urge you to show respect and courtesy for people or companies about whom you comment. Keep in mind that this is a public, professional business discussion. RetailWire reserves the right to edit or refuse the publication of remarks that we deem unsuitable. We may also correct for unintended spelling and grammatical errors.

Instant Poll
Are retailers underutilizing the supply chain forecasting expertise of their suppliers?




To participate in this QuickPoll, please enter your email address:

You may avoid this prompt in the future by registering / logging in.

Comments:

SKU Segmentation is a terrific idea. But let's take a more shopper-centric view. There is more to this than forecast accuracy. The SKU grading should also take into consideration which items tended to be present in the market baskets of a retailer's tier one customers. Another segmentation technique might be "key item"--those items which are taking a primary position in the planogram. Key items can be inferred by taking the best-selling, high-margin items from the last 13 weeks of planogram performance.

[Image of: View Braintrust Panelist button]
Bill Robinson, Principal Consultant, Bill Robinson Associates

This focus on individual SKUs is the flip side of the other thread today on loyalty cards. There really are only three mechanical ingredients to an individual sale: the shopper, the product and the place in the store where the connection occurs. Segmenting shoppers and segmenting products are both vast steps forward over weekly roll-ups of sales data. Both are necessary as a part of the "Return to Personal Selling at Retail," about which I will present a keynote at next months Shopper Insights conference.

However, both SKU segmentation and shopper segmentation are still blunt instruments. The real potential is to eventually skip the segmentation and go directly to item management and shopper management, a la Amazon (not that they don't use segmentation.) But the point is that it IS becoming possible to treat each shopper as an individual, just as Amazon adapts their offer to the individual as soon as the shopper is identified (shows up on the site) and begins clicking, giving specific, real-time evidence of what they might be seeking.

As long as loyalty cards continue to be thought of as a clever way to PAY shoppers to buy, they will continue to feed the misguided attitude that money is the most important thing to the shopper, even though we know that in CPG/FMCG world, time is typically more important than money.

How to get to the ultimate in segmentation, where one shopper is matched to one product, one at a time? That is a process that begins in the mind of the marketer and will never end, but will accelerate with the increasing deployment of the internet on "PDAs" in the store, the "Amazonification" of the store. However, long before this tidal wave engulfs retailing, smart retailers will attack the greatest barrier to accelerating sales. It is that gray matter between the retailer's (and brand supplier's) own ears.

[Image of: View Braintrust Panelist button]
Herb Sorensen, Ph.D., Scientific Advisor TNS Global Retail & Shopper, Adjunct Senior Fellow, Ehrenberg-Bass Institute

It all sounds good, but reality is that most companies don't leverage their POS/SKU level sales data very well at all. Companies might leverage POS data on a retailer by retailer basis. But in 95% of accounts that I work with there is very little POS data integration in existance. Companies know they need it, but are not investing in the necessary architecture to cleanse and harmonize the POS data. This would allow them to integrate it with their internal data and other syndicated data and apply formulas that would best fit their business. Each company needs to use the forecasting method they deem best for their product, but the bottom line is that without reliable data to report from, the reports will not be reliable.

[Image of: View Braintrust Panelist button]
Janet Dorenkott, VP & Co-owner, Relational Solutions, Inc.

Good article Dan, and interesting comments Herb.

One minor point. Tough to reduce inventory unless the manufacture is willing to put the product in smaller cases, with fewer products.

Mike Spindler, Managing Partner, Panther Mountain Companies, LLC

I think SKU segmentation based on demand and/or forecast variability is a good start.

The challenge we see is that each function is taking a parochial approach to utilizing POS data. The situation brings to mind the parable of the six blind men and the elephant. You'll recall one man was touching the trunk and thought it a snake, another the ear and thought it a leaf, the leg a tree, the tail a rope. Today we have sales teams, sales operations, trade promotion, demand planning, VMI/CRP team and logistics each trying to solve the problem on their own yet each is falling short in developing a compelling value proposition. Moreover, manufacturers are at risk of losing their scale economies -- with shopper insights, with data management, with tools and best practices--in addition to a consistent view of demand to maintain manufacturing scale.

Industry leaders need to shape a corporate strategy for POS data. They need to 'draw the elephant' and align disparate initiatives against a shared vision and right to win the POS game. This is a fast-changing area, so we are not ready to cast the elephant in bronze just yet. But to paraphrase the ancient Chinese proverb: If you don't know where you are going, all roads lead there.

Johan Sauer, Managing Partner, JibSail Consulting LLC

I've always believed that as essential and important as demand forecasting was, it was what you did with the forecast that really made the difference. The devil was in the execution. No matter how 'accurate' a forecast was, it was still highly unlikely to truly be considered accurate very often.

This, however, is a concept that is exciting. It's an intriguing concept, that while not reducing the importance of execution, certainly provides a far more reliable starting point. I'm eager to learn more.

[Image of: View Braintrust Panelist button]
Ted Hurlbut, Principal, Hurlbut & Associates

An awful lot of volatility stems from promotional tactics, both competitive and otherwise. Translation: coordinate your trade promotion calendar with your competitors' calendars. In most cases, it doesn't mean you need to communicate directly with your competitors, since most grocery brands simply repeat the same promotions very predictably, year after year. Is it a surprise to see hot dogs and hot dog rolls promoted around July 4th? Is it a shock to see turkeys, cranberry sauce, and pumpkin on deal before Thanksgiving? Suppliers, supermarket managements, and shoppers all know the promo calendar. Just once, wouldn't it be fun to be surprised?

Mark Lilien, Consultant, Retail Technology Group

Follow Us...
[Image of:  Twitter Icon] [Image of:  Facebook Icon] [Image of:  LinkedIn Icon] [Image of:  RSS Icon]

Welcome to the new RetailWire!
Send your FEEDBACK so we can keep the improvements coming.